Teams

KCox (MPCC)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-04vs ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTorey Parsons / Catherine Hensley vs Robin Smith / Kim Sheehey6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Farrell / Suzanne Crutcher vs Shelley Crocker / Carrie Coulson6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Ryan / Patti Glassner vs Amanda Cheek / Katie Bissett1-6, 1-6
2026-08-28vs SAliota/CBauer (Carmel)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Hensley / Torey Parsons vs Errin Jensen / Julie Johnson4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAmanda Cash / Sarah Ryan vs Catherine Bauer / Jennifer Harrison5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Simmons / Sandra Schulte vs Stephanie Parker / Mandi Mohammed4-6, 4-6
2026-08-21vs VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Cash / Rebecca Drendel vs Erin Pacilli / Claudia Ridley1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJennifer Farrell / Katie Cox vs Loretta Anderson / Pattye Figman6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Hensley / Kathryn Ford vs Susan Additon / Leslie Gaylord6-4, 6-3
2026-08-14vs BBrown (Park Crossing)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Farrell / Torey Parsons vs Jinna Harmon / Danielle Hutcheson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Hensley / Amanda Cash vs Diane Harrington / Tish Macuga3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Cox / Rebecca Drendel vs Marion Mande / Tatiana Thomas3-6, 4-6
2026-08-07vs CMcKiernan (Raintree)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAmanda Cash / Torey Parsons vs Niki Koesel / Liz Hamilton6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTamara Robb / Kathryn Ford vs Kelley Baughman / Linda Lober7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSandra Schulte / Katie Cox vs Margot Bizon / Tina Bobrowski7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAliota/CBauer (Carmel)2060243
2VWade/KCollins (Jeff Adams)2051229
3SStroud/MMetzl (Sardis)2051224
4LDyer (Mountainbrook)2042548
5JWoodruff (CSRC)2042555
6LPratt/CPrejean (Lifetime)1030012
7MMcHugh (Queens)1030012
8KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)1030113
9SGrindle (WSRC)1021217
10CAckels (PCC)1021226
11KRichards (Raintree)1021220
12SNewman (BCC)1021218
13BDunn (PPRSC)1021217
14JJZhu (Park Road)1021326
15KOShea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)1021326
16EBass/LThompson (Sardis)1021323
17LDiman/Magee (Carmel)1021322
18JCarlsen (River Hills Country Club)1021427
19JHerlong/LOCallaghan (FCC)1142446
20KCox (MPCC)1142555
21SChandra (Charlotte Tennis - Sharon Lakes)1142547
22LHuntington (Park Road)1133648
23AMilas (OPRC)1133751
24KGreathouse (Russell)1124863
25BBrown (Park Crossing)1124857
26VTolson/Petras (FCC)000000
27CChilds (Blakeney)000000
28SNester/SHarris (Windyrush)000000
29AHall (Raintree)0112428
30SDurovic/Wilson (Palisades)0112430
31LAndersen/SGossert (Shannamara)0112428
32TMermans/JPetrikis (WSRC)0112425
33JFontaine/Inga (Life Time)0112535
34MTurturro (OPRC)0112537
35ACutts (WSRC)0112528
36CMcKiernan (Raintree)0103638
37THyso (Life Time)0103634
38VBorkey (Pine Lake CC)0103636
39ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen)0103632
40VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)0224961
41DPorter/Fuller (Carmel)02151068
42CMiller (Charlotte CC)02151067
43ATrexler/LPelletier (Queens)02151072
44ASmith (OPRC)02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Catherine Hensley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Tamara Robb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Rebecca Drendel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Katie Cox
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Sandra Schulte
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Torey Parsons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Jennifer Farrell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Kathryn Ford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Janelle Lenhart
published
2.72
Amanda Cash
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Patti Glassner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Crutcher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Hensley
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
Tamara Robb
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Rebecca Drendel
43W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Katie Cox
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Sandra Schulte
16W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Torey Parsons
48W–61L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jennifer Farrell
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.90
Kathryn Ford
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Janelle Lenhart
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.79
3
Amanda Cash
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Patti Glassner
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Suzanne Crutcher
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.