← Teams

GoldMembers

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

1 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Robert Peters
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
Results9 ties
2019-08-24Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesChristopher Grippo / Robert Peters vs Rohit Agarwal / Bob Edwards7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2019-08-10Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesDaniel Salinas / Robert Peters vs Jeremey White / Trevor Morrison6-1, 6-2
2019-08-10Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesChris Wickham / Robert Peters vs Sudheer Raj Motakatla / Michael Luo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-06-28Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesDaniel Salinas / Robert Peters vs Charles Thrash / Krishnan Seshadri6-4, 6-2
2019-04-28Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Salinas / Robert Peters vs David Hunter / Oscar Grados6-4, 7-6
2019-03-10Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Salinas / Robert Peters vs John Wheeler / Craig Fulkerson6-2, 6-4
2019-02-23Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesRobert Peters / Daniel Salinas vs Stephen Hughes / Michael Kendall6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2019-02-17Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesRobert Peters / Daniel Salinas vs Jim Little / Kevin Keiler6-4, 6-1
2019-01-26Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesRobert Peters / Daniel Salinas vs Wayne Mazikowski / Edmond Mount6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Robert Peters
22W–20L career
4%96%0%
2.67

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.