Teams

SGV Infinity-J.Chow-Arroyo High/SU10

2025 Mixed Doubles - 55 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - 7.0 Mixed

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-06vs SGV LLW Dare Doubles-Yen-WN/SA8Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTam Vo / Josephine Chow vs Junko Noguchi / Yi Yang7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-24vs SGV LLW Dare Doubles-Yen-WN/SA8Won 10
W#3 DoublesJesse Huang / Josephine Chow vs Peter Yen / Junko Noguchi2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-10vs SGV LLW Dare Doubles-Yen-WN/SA8Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHung Ho / CARA Yokomizo vs Roy Li / Lauren Koenig2-6, 4-6
2025-07-19vs SGV LLW Dare Doubles-Yen-WN/SA8Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHung Ho / CARA Yokomizo vs Lauren Koenig / Roy Li1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-13vs SGV LLW Dare Doubles-Yen-WN/SA8Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJosephine Chow / Jesse Huang vs Dave Sparks / Christine Ontiveros6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Jesse Huang
published
Hung Ho
published 4
3.73
Maureen Jaramillo
published
3.53
Mai Gu
published
3.50
LINH LEE
published
3.46
Jun Yuan
published
3.44
Karen Obst
published
3.40
Danny Gloria
published 3.5
3.32
Placido MacAraeg
published
3.16
Tanya Robinson
published
3.10
Miki Makiko Shimizu
published
2.98
Dan Alvarez
published 3
2.72
Barb Vetterick
published 3
2.71
CARA Yokomizo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Josephine Chow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jerry Waliry
published
Shihyuan Chi
published
Zhilin Zhang
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jesse Huang
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.00
4
Hung Ho
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Jaramillo
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Mai Gu
13W–16L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
LINH LEE
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.50
Jun Yuan
21W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Karen Obst
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Danny Gloria
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.40
Placido MacAraeg
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
Tanya Robinson
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.16
Miki Makiko Shimizu
20W–32L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Dan Alvarez
29W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Barb Vetterick
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
3
CARA Yokomizo
23W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Josephine Chow
145W–300L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
Jerry Waliry
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shihyuan Chi
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zhilin Zhang
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.