Teams

GTC-Kadoshima/Francisco

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

1 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Melanie Redding
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Results9 ties
2022-03-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie Redding / Karin Mattson vs Lindsey Anderson / Kim Hedger5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-03-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie Redding / Karin Mattson vs Lisa Kim / Misa Banks6-1, 7-6
2022-03-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesMelanie Redding / Christie Shan vs Sarah Zaske / Beth Wray6-3, 7-5
2022-03-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesMelanie Redding / Aline Pereira vs Andrea Maison / Ellen Gallinatti2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-02-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie Redding / Michelle Nguyen vs Genevieve Warren / Merrie Vieco6-2, 6-1
2022-01-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelanie Redding / Jennie Hong vs Suzanne Eichenlaub / Pamela Kraus3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKarin Mattson / Melanie Redding vs Lori Nehls / Julie Smith3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJenny Sia / Melanie Redding vs Kim de Booij - Moors / Anne Wilson7-6, 6-1
2022-01-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGemma Gimpes / Melanie Redding vs Dinah Satterwhite / Kerrie Houston Reightley7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Melanie Redding
110W–136L career
8%92%0%
3.62

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.