Teams

Gregory/Nashville

2026 Mixed 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Mixed -Sunday

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-26vs McDonald/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesMorgan Williamson / Keith Williamson vs Lynelle McDonald / Evan Curran2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGillian Stewart / Walt Boling vs Debra Hutjens / Nicolas Tempels0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGrace Bryan / Justin Bryan vs Anna Hall / Brent Jean7-5, 6-2
2026-07-19vs Sharpe/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJosh Gregory / Alise Gregory vs Jon Gugala / Erin Akery2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Williamson / Morgan Williamson vs William Jones / Mary Claiborne Sharpe2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWalt Boling / Gillian Stewart vs Norbert Molnar / Regan Baltasar6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-26vs McDonald/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesWalt Boling / Grace Bryan vs Brian Shubert / Susanna Vaughan3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Williamson / Morgan Williamson vs Kylie Davis / Joe Williams3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlise Gregory / Josh Gregory vs Hollie Williams / Jason Grissom5-7, 2-6
2026-06-21vs Sharpe/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesKeith Williamson / Morgan Williamson vs Cole Kelley / Kristen Conoley5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJustin Bryan / Grace Bryan vs William Jones / Mary Claiborne Sharpe6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJosh Gregory / Alise Gregory vs Zack Gonzalez / Marybeth Snodgrass4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-07vs McDonald/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesGrace Bryan / Justin Bryan vs Jason Grissom / Kylie Davis0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJosh Gregory / Alise Gregory vs Nicolas Tempels / Debra Hutjens6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGillian Stewart / Walt Boling vs Susanna Vaughan / Brent Jean7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-31vs Sharpe/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJustin Bryan / Grace Bryan vs John Dillman / Ariana Cubillos Voegler3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJosh Gregory / Alise Gregory vs Christopher Sy / Sarah Torrence5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Stewart / Gillian Stewart vs Jon Gugala / Erin Akery0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Mixed -Sunday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sharpe/Nashville4214413127
2McDonald/Nashville4210818150
3Gregory/Nashville1531532209

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Morgan Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Grace Bryan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Alise Gregory
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Gillian Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Morgan Williamson
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Grace Bryan
14W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Alise Gregory
6W–9L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18
Gillian Stewart
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.