Teams

Tasker/Memphis

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 6.5 18 & Over Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-09vs Eddy/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Ewing / Stefenie Block vs Beth Halbach / Lynn Henderson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKara Richetti / Nancy Chandrasekaran vs Tamara Steinhausler / Alexandra Steinhausler2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesHallie Bauer / Tanya Myers vs Jessica Flesch / Emily Stolnicki6-7, 3-6
2025-09-02vs Cignetti/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmi Tasker / Tanya Myers vs Alyssa Pahules / Jamie Harris6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSally Gillum / Stefenie Block vs Sherene Katzman / Alissa Anthony6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHallie Bauer / Nancy Chandrasekaran vs Glaucia Novoa / Leslie Pickett1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-08-26vs Palmer/MemphisLost 02
L#2 DoublesHallie Bauer / Stefenie Block vs Alexandra Roll / Ashley Riney6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Chandrasekaran / Sally Gillum vs Bradley Fogelman / Natalie McClure1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Tanya Myers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Ami Tasker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Sally Gillum
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Stefenie Block
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.62
Nancy Chandrasekaran
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Hallie Bauer
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.39
Kara Richetti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanya Myers + Ami Tasker211454% games+6.0% vs expected
Stefenie Block + Hallie Bauer033 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Chandrasekaran + Sally Gillum123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tanya Myers
24W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Ami Tasker
27W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Sally Gillum
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Stefenie Block
18W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Nancy Chandrasekaran
11W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
Hallie Bauer
9W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Kara Richetti
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.