Teams

1-KHoekstra-HR 40 6.5

2023 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-25vs 6-SSmith-HVCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Fortin / Lisa Hsu vs Kristen Ingle / Aimee Poduri7-5, 6-4
2023-09-18vs 2-KTravis-EnoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMaggie Fritz-Morkin / Barbie McGarrah vs Joyce Robinson / Katie Elder3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMary Fortin / Elisabeth James vs Barbara van Leeuwen / Millicent Snow6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-09-11vs 3-LWollman-CHCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Ennis / Lisa Hsu vs Monica Jenkins / Leslie Brown1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-08-28vs 4-MLong-Eno 40 6.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Ennis / Lisa Hsu vs Sarah Franks / Michelle Trinco6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnna Wilson / Mary Fortin vs Caroline Patzer / Mary T Long6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-21vs 5-LKieffer-UNCLost 01
L#3 DoublesJaime Parker / Barbie McGarrah vs Rebecca Tomasini / LAURIE KIEFFER3-6, 1-6
2023-08-07vs 2-KTravis-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesBarbie McGarrah / Jaime Parker vs Millie Hunter / Mary Macdonald6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Fortin / Anna Wilson vs Mary Parker / Krissy Anderson3-6, 2-6
2023-08-02vs 5-LKieffer-UNCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Hsu / Lisa Ennis vs Diane Willis / Ann Weissler3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Fortin / Abigail Hatcher vs Chris Jackson / LAURIE KIEFFER6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKateri Hoekstra / Barbie McGarrah vs Kelly Johnson / Nancy Cidlowski2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Abigail Hatcher
published 3.5
3.18
Jaime Parker
published
3.18
Lisa Hsu
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.14
Deborah Garbee
published 3.5
3.10
Mary Fortin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.00
Maggie Fritz-Morkin
published
2.89
Barbie McGarrah
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Anna Wilson
published 3
2.63
Cindy Cleary
published 3
Kateri Hoekstra
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abigail Hatcher
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Jaime Parker
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Lisa Hsu
91W–91L career · 7 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Deborah Garbee
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Mary Fortin
113W–105L career · 9 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Maggie Fritz-Morkin
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.00
3
Barbie McGarrah
82W–65L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Anna Wilson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Cindy Cleary
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
Kateri Hoekstra
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.