Teams

Smith, John

2023 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.10 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-11-05vs Kirsch, ScottWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlec Bergeron / Jason Shindler vs Andy Brez / Sam Cargnel6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Baker / Jeffrey Marcott vs James Dawkins / Michael Graves6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDafang Zhang / Gadi Bramson vs Norman Friedman / Hang Chen6-2, 6-1
2022-06-02vs Kirsch, ScottWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Marcott / Jason Shindler vs Christopher Jones / Benjamin Sheldon6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristopher Wiedmeyer / Brad Harding vs Sam Cargnel / Nikhil Parimi5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Baker / Shahzad Shafique vs Dave Walterscheid / Daniel Curley6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Alec Bergeron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Jason Shindler
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Bond Marrs
published 4
Dafang Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Jeffrey Marcott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Brad Harding
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Christopher Wiedmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Gadi Bramson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Smith
published
Shahzad Shafique
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Steve Baker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alec Bergeron + Jason Shindler7357% games+12.6% vs expected
Brad Harding + Jeffrey Marcott10754% games+2.4% vs expected
Gadi Bramson + Bond Marrs1540% games−4.8% vs expected
John Smith + Steve Baker0633% games−11.0% vs expected
Gadi Bramson + Dafang Zhang4355% gamesnot enough data
Gadi Bramson + Steve Baker4350% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Marcott + Steve Baker2348% gamesnot enough data
Brad Harding + Christopher Wiedmeyer044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alec Bergeron
23W–19L career · 1 line in 2023
50%50%<1%
4.00
Jason Shindler
36W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Bond Marrs
16W–54L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Dafang Zhang
11W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeffrey Marcott
65W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Brad Harding
51W–88L career · 3 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Christopher Wiedmeyer
14W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Gadi Bramson
18W–37L career · 1 line in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
John Smith
4W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shahzad Shafique
20W–10L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Steve Baker
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.