Teams

Florida/Gonzalez/40&Over4.5M

2024 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

19 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-08vs Just Buck It - J. TorresWon 20
W#1 DoublesFernando Gonzalez / Alejandro Mucino vs James Mason / Ricardo Ramirez6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJames Evans / Felix Tromp vs Gunnar Nelson / Mohamed Khader6-1, 6-2
2024-06-01vs Just Buck It - J. TorresWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Evans / Filipe Mendes vs Ricardo Ramirez / Mark Kanarek6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCraig Arndt / Sean Vickery vs Paul Zack / Thach Dinh6-1, 6-0
2024-05-11vs Just Buck It - J. TorresSplit 11
W#1 SinglesGerardo Cuevas vs Lance Hill7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJames Evans / Jeffrey Evans vs Mark Kanarek / Ricardo Ramirez0-6, 3-6
2024-05-04vs Just Buck It - J. TorresWon 20
W#1 SinglesAlejandro Mucino vs Thach Dinh6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Evans / Alvaro Echeverry vs Joshua McKinley / Mohamed Khader6-1, 6-0
2024-04-20vs Just Buck It - J. TorresSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSamuel Biller / Felix Tromp vs Ricardo Ramirez / Mark Kanarek3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSean Vickery / Craig Arndt vs Lance Hill / James Mason6-4, 6-1
2024-04-13vs Just Buck It - J. TorresWon 30
W#1 SinglesCraig Arndt vs Vong Keovongsa6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPatrick Chang / Gerardo Cuevas vs David Hennessee / Joshua McKinley6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSean Vickery / Julio Zeballos vs Thach Dinh / Paul Zack6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-06vs Just Buck It - J. TorresWon 20
W#2 DoublesSean Vickery / Alvaro Echeverry vs Ricardo Ramirez / Mark Kanarek4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Evans / Samuel Biller vs Sebastian Graba / Paul Zack6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Ben Tucker
published 4.5
4.50
Patrick Chang
published
4.33
Alejandro Mucino
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.31
Craig Arndt
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.30
Matthew Schnell
published
4.26
Jeffrey Evans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Alvaro Echeverry
published 4.5
4.24
Samuel Biller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
Daniel Zantedeschi
published 4.5
4.22
Michael Dixon
published
4.10
James Evans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.08
Gerardo Cuevas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.85
Julio Zeballos
published
3.59
Fernando Gonzalez
published
Edward Peterson
published
FELIPE RAMIREZ
published
Felix Tromp
published
Filipe Mendes
published
Sean Vickery
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Arndt + Sean Vickery8751% games−14.0% vs expected
Jeffrey Evans + James Evans5949% gamesnot enough data
James Evans + Samuel Biller224 matchesnot enough data
Alejandro Mucino + Fernando Gonzalez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ben Tucker
8W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
4.53
Patrick Chang
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.50
4.5
Alejandro Mucino
24W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.33
4.5
Craig Arndt
65W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
Matthew Schnell
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.30
Jeffrey Evans
84W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Alvaro Echeverry
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Samuel Biller
61W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Daniel Zantedeschi
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Michael Dixon
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
James Evans
21W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
Gerardo Cuevas
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08
Julio Zeballos
1W–11L career · no lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
3.85
Fernando Gonzalez
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.59
Edward Peterson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
FELIPE RAMIREZ
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Felix Tromp
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Filipe Mendes
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sean Vickery
21W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.