Teams

DB Gerling

2025 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-17vs Alachua/Smith/40&over3.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesZach Randall / Mehmet Genc vs Rajesh Gurrala / Chris Redding6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Landis / Bob Gerling vs HEE-SUNG BAE / Jonathan Taffe5-7, 0-6
2025-06-10vs JTC LancasterLost 01
L#3 DoublesMehmet Genc / William Landis vs Mark Bernard / Brian Kim3-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs Alachua/Smith/40&over3.0MLost 02
L#1 SinglesMehmet Genc vs Conor O'Dwyer4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJack Gandolfo / William Landis vs Sergei Tevosian / Chris Redding7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-01vs Alachua/Torres-Vasquez/40&over3.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesAaron McGriff / Mehmet Genc vs David Cianci / Aaron Kelley5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBob Gerling / William Landis vs June Navarro / Anthony Gonzalez4-6, 0-6
2025-05-23vs JTC LancasterLost 01
L#2 DoublesMehmet Genc / Martin Noguera vs Gary Orr / Gregg Fissenden3-6, 2-6
2025-05-15vs Alachua/Torres-Vasquez/40&over3.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesMehmet Genc / Jack Gandolfo vs Diwakar Vyas / Anthony Gonzalez5-7, 1-6
2025-05-10vs Alachua/Torres-Vasquez/40&over3.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesAaron McGriff / William Landis vs Dan Harloff / Alexander Johnson1-6, 1-6
2025-04-27vs Alachua/Smith/40&over3.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesBob Gerling / Mehmet Genc vs Yury Zasimovich / Conor O'Dwyer1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMartin Noguera / William Landis vs HEE-SUNG BAE / Chris Redding3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Jack Gandolfo
published
2.90
Zach Randall
published
2.86
Jamie Patmore
published
2.84
Jennifer Gerling
published
2.69
Marc Schnoll
published
2.66
Bob Gerling
published 3
2.62
Martin Noguera
published
2.60
William Landis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Mehmet Genc
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marc Schnoll + Jack Gandolfo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jack Gandolfo
12W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Zach Randall
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Jamie Patmore
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Jennifer Gerling
22W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Marc Schnoll
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Bob Gerling
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Martin Noguera
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
William Landis
15W–65L career · 6 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Mehmet Genc
44W–92L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.