Teams

TYCC - J. Feeney

2023 Hillsborough Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.08 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-09-09vs Hills/J. Orsini/18&Over8.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesMike Ward / Samuel Biller vs Yarek Orsini / Jonathan F Collazo5-7, 3-6
2023-08-27vs River Hills Rally - F. WuLost 01
L#2 DoublesSamuel Biller / Nacho La Puente vs Ricardo Ramirez / Hansil Kalaria3-6, 4-6
2023-08-19vs HCC Tigers - J. EspinozaLost 01
L#2 DoublesSamuel Biller / Trey Thomas vs Nelson RodriguezDiaz / Davis Bilardello4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSamuel Biller / Brian Berling vs Paul Zack / David Bounds4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSamuel Biller / Nacho La Puente vs Gillie McCreath / Bob Murdock5-7, 2-6
2023-07-15vs HCC Tigers - J. EspinozaLost 01
L#1 DoublesSamuel Biller / James Lass vs Kyle Madill / Miguel Angel Goni Rodrigo1-6, 3-6
2023-07-08vs Hills/J. Orsini/18&Over8.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesSamuel Biller / Mike Ward vs Ani Ganesan / Rafael Angel Rodriguez Gonzalez4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSamuel Biller / James Lass vs Paul Zack / Brian Stone4-6, 3-6
2023-06-17vs River Hills Rally - F. WuLost 01
L#1 DoublesSamuel Biller / Timothy Sackmaster vs Ignacio Molina / Joseph Harrington1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Samuel Biller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
3.89
RICHARD CASEY
published
3.76
Chase Pattillo
published 4
Daniel Perez
published 4
David Germain
published 4
3.66
James Lass
published 4
3.65
Gregg Coldiron
published 4
3.63
John Feeney
published
3.38
Timothy Sackmaster
published
Kevin Platt
published
Nacho La Puente
published
Trey Thomas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregg Coldiron + Samuel Biller134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Samuel Biller
61W–85L career · 9 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
4.26
RICHARD CASEY
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Chase Pattillo
3W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Daniel Perez
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
David Germain
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
James Lass
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Gregg Coldiron
20W–35L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
John Feeney
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
Timothy Sackmaster
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.38
Kevin Platt
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nacho La Puente
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Trey Thomas
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.