Teams

LCTA18/Kryder/Independent

Combo 18 & Over · Women 9.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.62 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-28vs HHTL18/Bailey/ChaplinLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristen Whitehead / Martha Lee vs Carolina Lainez / Katie Ruth2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Warren / HELEN BENNETT vs Dziyana Nazaruk / Dale Cross3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy O'Dell-Keim / Alice Kryder vs Kristen Finlen / Lisa Bailey2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-28vs LCTA18/Richey/CTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesHaley Powell / Alice Kryder vs Samantha Schuster / Jordan Bowers6-3, 0-3
W#2 DoublesAnna Yates / Ann Harrah vs Kimberly Faust / Ilaisaane Carter6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy O'Dell-Keim / HELEN BENNETT vs Tessa Radziej / Katie Richey3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-27vs LCTA18/Jain/IndependantLost 12
W#1 DoublesHaley Powell / Ann Harrah vs Brenna Feirer / Alexandra Dawson6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy O'Dell-Keim / Martha Lee vs Tabatha Butler / Samantha Sullivan4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Warren / Alice Kryder vs Anita Jain / Madison Cook1-6, 3-6
2024-10-26vs LLAS UPTA18C/FenigerWon 21
W#1 DoublesHaley Powell / Martha Lee vs Michele Jain / Julianne Foster6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Warren / Ann Harrah vs Liza Feniger / Dorie Fann7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Yates / Alice Kryder vs Carol Hayduk / Rhonda Watson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-10-26vs LATA18/KWescott/LCTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHaley Powell / HELEN BENNETT vs Lisa Barrett / Madeleine Moore7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy O'Dell-Keim / Ann Harrah vs Brooke Walter / Kristin Estes7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.74
Haley Powell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
HELEN BENNETT
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Ann Harrah
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.12
Alice Kryder
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.09
Karen Warren
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kristen Whitehead
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy O'Dell-Keim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Harrah + Alice Kryder2347% gamesnot enough data
HELEN BENNETT + Alice Kryder314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Haley Powell
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
4.74
4.5
HELEN BENNETT
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Ann Harrah
40W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Alice Kryder
41W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
Karen Warren
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.09
Kristen Whitehead
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Nancy O'Dell-Keim
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.