Teams

HCC Wiertel

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-17vs Burkwood Cook WKDAYLost 13
W#1 DoublesAndrea Wassmer / Rita Ryan vs Ellen Bedichek / Donna Mourtzakis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLisa Frazier vs Tara Sobel6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Wiertel / Renee Fisher vs Beth Krider / Sandy Cook6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKatherine Cook vs Teresa Landes-Shuler4-6, 2-6
2025-05-23vs TDC SpillareLost 13
W#1 DoublesLisa Frazier / Kathy Harcum vs Fran Wigner / Amy Foy6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Broughton vs Cory Dunn2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLynne Butz / Jennifer Morgan vs Alison Spelbring / Tonya Atack4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Polk / Kimberly Way vs Kim Spillare / Laura Wheeler2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Lisa Frazier
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Rita Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Andrea Broughton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Wassmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Kathy Harcum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Lauren Hutcheson
published
3.02
Renee Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Elizabeth Wiertel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Stacey Haug
published
2.87
Lynne Butz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Alexia Gerczak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Debra Suyama
published 3
Jennifer Polk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Cook
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Kimberly Way
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Wiertel + Stacey Haug3256% games+11.5% vs expected
Stacey Haug + Lauren Hutcheson3254% games+4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Frazier
18W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
Rita Ryan
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Andrea Broughton
23W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Andrea Wassmer
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Kathy Harcum
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Lauren Hutcheson
21W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.15
Renee Fisher
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.02
3
Elizabeth Wiertel
29W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Stacey Haug
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
Lynne Butz
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.87
3
Alexia Gerczak
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Debra Suyama
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63
Jennifer Polk
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Cook
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Way
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.