Teams

LMcRee

2022 Capital Fall 18 & Over Singles League · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-13Won 20
W#2 SinglesEmily Andino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKristen Duke vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-06vs CLeLieverWon 30
W#1 SinglesKeeley McCormick vs Christina LeLiever6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKristen Duke vs Stephanie Sneeden6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesLanier McRee vs Chase Felmet6-1, 6-0
2022-09-29vs LHammondWon 20
W#2 SinglesRossi Evans vs Shannon Aumer6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesEmily Andino vs Michelle Metelo6-2, 6-3
2022-09-22vs JKomesWon 10
W#1 SinglesKeeley McCormick vs Alison Sinclair6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-09-15Won 30
W#1 SinglesKeeley McCormick vs Amy Flowers6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRossi Evans vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesEmily Andino vs Yisteen DuBose6-4, 6-3
2022-09-08vs KLevineLost 02
L#2 SinglesRossi Evans vs Kristen Levine4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesKristen Duke vs Laurie Holderness3-6, 3-6
2022-09-03vs AGranthamWon 21
W#1 SinglesKeeley McCormick vs Ashley Grantham6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKristen Duke vs Lusally Hong2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesEmily Andino vs Gabriela Flores6-0, 6-3
2022-09-01Won 10
W#3 SinglesLanier McRee vs Erynn Stainback6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Katherine King
published
3.03
Rossi Evans
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.93
Keeley McCormick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.88
Lanier McRee
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.55
Kristen Duke
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.28
Emily Andino
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Duke + Lanier McRee12756% games+2.5% vs expected
Lanier McRee + Keeley McCormick4160% gamesnot enough data
Lanier McRee + Rossi Evans5068% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Duke + Rossi Evans224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine King
15W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3
Rossi Evans
142W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Keeley McCormick
47W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Lanier McRee
120W–98L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Kristen Duke
115W–104L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
2.5
Emily Andino
36W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.