Teams

Suhor/18/5.0/M/BREC

2026 BR Adult 18 & Over - Men · 5.0 BR (18&O) Men

6 players · average NTRP 5.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-12vs LA 5.0M 18 & Over (Dornier)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJosiah Lim / Ian Sparkman vs Ryan Dornier / Lucas Richardson6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGregory Suhor vs Elliot Minvielle4-6, 0-6
2026-04-30vs SABA/18/5.0/M/LegLost 02
L#1 DoublesJosiah Lim / Gregory Suhor vs Jacques Peltier / Brent Saba4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesEric Hartenstein vs Matthew Chester1-6, 2-6
2026-04-04vs LA 5.0M 18 & Over (Dornier)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesPatrick Stegall / Cameron Andry vs Ryan Dornier / Lucas Richardson6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJosiah Lim vs Bryce Walker1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGregory Suhor / Ian Sparkman vs Darren Thevenote / Antonio Sasso0-6, 4-6
2026-03-29vs SABA/18/5.0/M/LegLost 12
L#1 DoublesEric Hartenstein / Gregory Suhor vs David Gazeley / Brent Saba1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesIan Sparkman vs Gabriel Martin6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJosiah Lim / Patrick Stegall vs George Newton / Jacques Peltier6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-03-29vs LA 5.0M 18 & Over (Dornier)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesIan Sparkman / Patrick Stegall vs Darren Thevenote / Elliot Minvielle2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCameron Andry vs Charles Fremaux2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEric Hartenstein / Gregory Suhor vs Nicholas DeFelice / Lucas Richardson5-7, 4-6
2026-03-29vs SABA/18/5.0/M/LegLost 12
W#1 DoublesJosiah Lim / Patrick Stegall vs David Gazeley / Matthew Chester7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesGregory Suhor vs Dominik Kardell2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEric Hartenstein / Ian Sparkman vs George Newton / Gabriel Martin6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.0 BR (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA 5.0M 18 & Over (Dornier)601449122
2SABA/18/5.0/M/Leg3361225185
3Suhor/18/5.0/M/BREC0641429200

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.42 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cameron Andry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.60
Josiah Lim
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.47
Ian Sparkman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.39
Gregory Suhor
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.38
Patrick Stegall
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.27
Eric Hartenstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Cameron Andry
2W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Josiah Lim
8W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.60
5
Ian Sparkman
20W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
4.47
5
Gregory Suhor
3W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
4.39
Patrick Stegall
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
4.38
5
Eric Hartenstein
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
4.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.