Teams

VAC-Leimback/Roy-8.0M

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Roy Seeman
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 4
Richard Graham
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
Victor Andrade
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
John Lindberg
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Results5 ties
2022-11-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMatt Grant / John Lindberg vs Roan Blacker / David Smith4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-10-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Graham / Roy Seeman vs Clarence Hollins / Jeff Peterson6-1, 6-2
2022-10-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Graham / Roy Seeman vs Kenji Yoshino / Gary Kozuma6-2, 6-2
2022-10-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLeonard Bauer / John Lindberg vs Peter Lusk / William Coats7-6, 6-3
2022-09-24Won 20
W#1 DoublesRichard Graham / Roy Seeman vs Perry Cooper / Jonathan Kim6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDarrel Leimback / John Lindberg vs Kenji Yoshino / Stefan Muehleis6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Roy Seeman
95W–40L career
1%97%2%
3.81
4
Richard Graham
131W–70L career
not enough data
3.5
Victor Andrade
46W–50L career
0%90%10%
3.44
3.5
John Lindberg
63W–82L career
20%80%0%
3.06

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.