Teams

Stephens/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-12-04vs Korenberg/Ramsey/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Morrissey / Courtney Hall vs Jacque Ramsey / Renee Anzivino6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMary Helen Wise vs Maria Schoonover1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCara Adams / Laura Slaughter vs Dawn Cole / Myrvete Korenberg3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCharlotte Dolan vs Aynsley Riser1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRebekah Carroll / Madison Fair vs Christy Briggs / Mary Stamelos7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Maret Caamano
published
3.20
Stephanie Hill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.17
Rebekah Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Elisa Hill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Mary Helen Wise
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.86
Amelia Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Madison Fair
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Romina Graham
published
2.74
Cara Adams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.42
Charlotte Dolan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Morrissey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Slaughter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amelia Stephens + Stephanie Hill3353% games+9.8% vs expected
Madison Fair + Elisa Hill213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maret Caamano
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Stephanie Hill
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Rebekah Carroll
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Elisa Hill
25W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Mary Helen Wise
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Amelia Stephens
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Madison Fair
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Romina Graham
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Cara Adams
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
2.5
Charlotte Dolan
5W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
0%70%30%
2.42
Elizabeth Morrissey
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laura Slaughter
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.