Teams

BAY CLUB PL 40AM4.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-16vs SAN RAMON VALLEY HS 40AM4.5AWon 21
W#1 SinglesPaul Liu vs Scott Sieckert6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDirk Geldenhuys / Steve Falk vs David Yuen / Klaus Widmann4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEugene Chen / Rick Morris vs Antonio Dalupan / Patrick Hart6-2, 6-4
2025-02-15vs SAN RAMON VALLEY HS 40AM4.5ASplit 22
W#1 DoublesDirk Geldenhuys / Steve Falk vs Leif Krauss / Ran Sendrovitz6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEugene Chen vs Jin Park6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMarty Gee / Rick Morris vs Matt Grintsaig / Klaus Widmann6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJimmy Kang / Paul Hendrickson vs David Gianelli / David Yuen1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Paul Liu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.17
Chandrasekar Sankaranarayanan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Teddy Handoko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Steve Falk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Marty Gee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Rick Morris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Brant McCall
published 4
3.31
Paul Hendrickson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Dirk Geldenhuys
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Eugene Chen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jimmy Kang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Liu
28W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Chandrasekar Sankaranarayanan
20W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%1%
4.17
Teddy Handoko
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
Steve Falk
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.96
Marty Gee
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
Rick Morris
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.85
4
Brant McCall
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Hendrickson
7W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Dirk Geldenhuys
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Eugene Chen
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jimmy Kang
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.