Teams

TVTC Phillips

2025 OH OV WINTER · SPRING A18&O

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-03vs TIC SuttonLost 01
L#1 DoublesWhitney Hess / Gus Andrews vs Tanner Moy / Tanner Whipkey1-6, 0-6
2025-04-19vs TIC SuttonLost 01
L#1 DoublesWhitney Hess / Gus Andrews vs Matthew Sutton / Tanner Whipkey0-6, 0-6
2025-04-13vs CTC NassifWon 10
W#1 DoublesWhitney Hess / Gus Andrews vs Joseph Nassif / Tom Wirts3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-13vs CTC NassifLost 01
L#1 DoublesWhitney Hess / Gus Andrews vs Jeffrey Goins / David Hanna3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-01Split 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Phillips / Gus Andrews vs Mark Jacobs / Richard Pickens6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesHeath Diehl vs Kevin Ellison6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-15vs TIC SuttonLost 01
L#2 SinglesHeath Diehl vs Brandon Gwinn1-6, 3-6
2025-01-26vs CTC NassifLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Graham / Gus Andrews vs Mychal Schulz / Jason Castle4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · SPRING A18&O
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTC Nassif63281740377
2TVTC Phillips18103575487

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Brian McCutcheon
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 4
3.38
Whitney Hess
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Christopher Cendana
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Dylan Tayengco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Leo Segal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Gus Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Russell Rollyson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Heath Diehl
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Scott Graham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitney Hess + Russell Rollyson10361% games−6.4% vs expected
Whitney Hess + Gus Andrews134 matchesnot enough data
Whitney Hess + Scott Graham303 matchesnot enough data
Leo Segal + Russell Rollyson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian McCutcheon
17W–11L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
Whitney Hess
64W–41L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Christopher Cendana
22W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dylan Tayengco
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leo Segal
5W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Gus Andrews
10W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Russell Rollyson
34W–56L career · 6 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
Heath Diehl
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Graham
21W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.