Teams

Veltri - Chen

2023 Broward TriLevel · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.73 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-26vs Wrc - RivasWon 20
W#2 DoublesEvelyn Daniels / Lidia Luz vs Maria Valeria Yandet / Maria Avellaneda6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGloria Marquez / Yulia Childs vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-19vs Midtown - DuranteSplit 11
W#1 DoublesUpasna Jha / Stacey Greaves vs ELIZABETH GORDILLO / Ana Carolina Manchester6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCheryl Smith / Yulia Childs vs Gabriela Reyes / MARIANA DURANTE0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-10-03vs Wrc - RivasWon 10
W#2 DoublesGina Goetz / Lidia Luz vs Maria Lanza / Maria Avellaneda6-2, 6-1
2023-09-14vs Midtown - DuranteLost 02
L#1 DoublesYulia Childs / Cheryl Smith vs Milka Vignali / Patrizia Smouse-Gomez2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGabriella Vayshelboym / Stacey Greaves vs Zorayda Hidalgo / Lorena Villar2-6, 3-6
2023-09-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesJody Julmice / Stacey Greaves vs Robin Hayden / Theresa Caruso7-5, 6-1
2023-09-01vs Broward/Cordova/Trilevel3.0/3.5/4.0WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCatherine Land / Stacey Greaves vs Garbine de la Mora / Ili Montnor1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGloria Marquez / Yulia Childs vs Sandy Shapiro / Mariana Rodriguez4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Diana Restrepo
published 4
4.01
Gina Goetz
published 4
3.92
3.82
Upasna Jha
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Catherine Land
published 4
3.67
Dana Reece
published 4
3.60
Lidia Luz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.22
Stacey Greaves
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Evelyn Daniels
published 3.5
2.85
Yulia Childs
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Gloria Marquez
published 3
Jody Julmice
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Land + Lidia Luz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Restrepo
46W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Gina Goetz
30W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Gabriella Vayshelboym
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Upasna Jha
204W–119L career · 1 line in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Catherine Land
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Dana Reece
18W–18L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Lidia Luz
104W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Stacey Greaves
88W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Evelyn Daniels
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Yulia Childs
78W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Gloria Marquez
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
Jody Julmice
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.