Teams

DPagano (Life Time)

2024 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Mixed 4.0 - Thurs PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-08-01vs FBey/CParker (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAnthony Roe / Daniela Pagano vs Colin Parker / Cynthia Staton5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoelle Surprenant / Philip Gibson vs Beverly Harrell / Sean Washington6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCJ ONeill / Van ONeill vs Fredia Waters / Steve Novak1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-07-29vs WJourdan (PPRSC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesElena Donaldson / Bob Hofmann vs Holly McClure / Andrew Ross6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephen Polacek / Emily Weigel vs Ashley Emison / Tim Hausmann7-5, 6-2
2024-07-25vs BStover/BHood (Blakeney)Won 21
W#1 DoublesIggy Levelev / Emily Weigel vs Carrie Childs / Robert Shore6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMindy Merchant / Anthony Roe vs India Branker / Jed Levitas6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheri King / Rajesh Sankaran vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-11vs JGriset (Blakeney)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesIggy Levelev / Daniela Pagano vs Scott Gallegos / Christina Peterson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMindy Merchant / Stephen Polacek vs Ramesh Thyagarajan / Tara Tyson3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCJ ONeill / Cheri King vs David Tyson / Smita Thakur7-5, 6-2
2024-06-27vs WParker (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBob Hofmann / Elena Donaldson vs Mario Henry / Caroline Pickup1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Gibson / Emily Weigel vs Chris Bauer / Rachael Schuler1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDaniela Pagano / Rajesh Sankaran vs Darnaye Black / Susan Sutherland3-6, 2-6
2024-06-20vs FMasucci/CWaldrop (WSRC)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBob Hofmann / Emily Weigel vs Cynthia Waldrop / Scott Waldrop6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnthony Roe / Mindy Merchant vs Jonathan Williams / Tricia Williams2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoelle Surprenant / Stephen Polacek vs Misty Jones / George Pawlush5-7, 4-6
2024-06-13vs JGluff (Palisades)Split 11
W#1 DoublesBob Hofmann / Elena Donaldson vs Wayne Ernest / Cecile Yager7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCJ ONeill / Van ONeill vs Jason Marriott / Michele Cooper2-6, 4-6
2024-06-06vs MZiewacz (Olde Providence)Split 11
W#1 DoublesEmily Weigel / Iggy Levelev vs Andrew Sanctis / Christina McWilliams2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephen Polacek / Joelle Surprenant vs Sarah Niess / Matthew Niess2-6, 4-6
2024-05-30vs KBrannock/JWolf (Weddington)Won 20
W#2 DoublesBob Hofmann / Emily Weigel vs Kristy Brannock / Simas Petrikis6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRajesh Sankaran / Joelle Surprenant vs Ben Gilchrist / Kristin Kapur6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Mixed 4.0 - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Elena Donaldson
published
3.97
Emily Weigel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Cheri King
published 4
3.82
Bob Hofmann
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Christine Wade
published 4
3.64
Philip Gibson
published
3.58
Rajesh Sankaran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
CJ ONeill
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.52
Mindy Merchant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Stephen Polacek
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.47
Daniela Pagano
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.25
Joelle Surprenant
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
2.92
Van ONeill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Van ONeill + CJ ONeill9851% games+9.3% vs expected
Emily Weigel + Bob Hofmann224 matchesnot enough data
Joelle Surprenant + Stephen Polacek134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elena Donaldson
26W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Emily Weigel
162W–80L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Cheri King
58W–37L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Bob Hofmann
57W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Christine Wade
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Philip Gibson
20W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.64
4
Rajesh Sankaran
63W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.58
3.5
CJ ONeill
67W–52L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
4
Mindy Merchant
13W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Stephen Polacek
99W–83L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
4
Daniela Pagano
152W–109L career · 3 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.47
4
Joelle Surprenant
71W–103L career · 4 lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
Van ONeill
18W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.