Teams

Nguyen, Tam

2026 Adult 18 & Over-JXN · Men 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-07vs Sims, JonathanLost 05
L#1 DoublesMichael Foley / Matthew Gordon vs Niven Walker / Daniel Phyfer7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTravis Donald vs Bryan Barksdale3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJason McKnatt / Kevin McKay vs Conner Fudge / Andrew Stubbs5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBryton Hixson vs Chris Lee5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAndrei Gregory / Josef Rutledge vs Bryan Howell / Andrew Haile0-6, 2-6
2026-03-24vs Clark, MichaelLost 13
W#1 DoublesDoug Burgess / Andrei Gregory vs Michael Clark / Matt Carpenter6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBryton Hixson vs Kelsey Smylie0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTom Hickman / Matthew Gordon vs JD Hosemann / Nico Jimeno6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJosef Rutledge vs Manuel Valdez1-6, 3-6
2026-03-18vs Williamson, GregLost 23
L#1 DoublesJason McKnatt / Bryton Hixson vs Hector Custode / Nick Morgan2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDominic Lopez vs Elkin Crews0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJosef Rutledge / Andrei Gregory vs Greg Williamson / Akhilesh Ganti5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesStephen Langley vs Tim Mask6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDoug Burgess / Michael Foley vs Luke Armstrong / Lee Young6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-24vs Sims, JonathanLost 05
L#1 DoublesMichael Foley / Travis Donald vs Daniel Phyfer / Brennan Miller3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJosef Rutledge vs Jackson Ikerd0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDoug Burgess / Kevin McKay vs Chris Lee / Andrew Haile4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAndrei Gregory vs Bryan Barksdale1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJason McKnatt / Tom Hickman vs Conner Fudge / Niven Walker0-6, 1-6
2026-02-17vs Medina, ChristianLost 14
W#1 DoublesAndrei Gregory / Josef Rutledge vs Sourav Dutta / Jay Irving6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDrew Green vs Seth Hudspeth4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTravis Donald / Dominic Lopez vs Rahul Chaddha / Hiren Arora0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Gordon vs Chad Myers4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTam Nguyen / Jason McKnatt vs Christian Medina / John Patton6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-10vs Clark, MichaelWon 41
W#1 DoublesJosef Rutledge / Andrei Gregory vs Austin O'Brien / Dario Rosa6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesBryton Hixson vs Nico Jimeno6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDoug Burgess / Kevin McKay vs JD Hosemann / Matt Carpenter4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesStephen Langley vs Kelsey Smylie0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTam Nguyen / Jason McKnatt vs Ricky Dean / Illan Ireland6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Josef Rutledge
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.63
Jason McKnatt
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.56
Matthew Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Kevin McKay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Stephen Langley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.50
Bryton Hixson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.50
Michael Foley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Doug Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.31
Drew Green
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.28
Andrei Gregory
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
Dominic Lopez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Tom Hickman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Travis Donald
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin McKay + Doug Burgess5350% games−9.6% vs expected
Kevin McKay + Stephen Langley3252% gamesnot enough data
Doug Burgess + Jason McKnatt134 matchesnot enough data
Andrei Gregory + Josef Rutledge224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josef Rutledge
2W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
Jason McKnatt
19W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Matthew Gordon
18W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kevin McKay
30W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
Stephen Langley
20W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Bryton Hixson
46W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Michael Foley
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Doug Burgess
39W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.44
4
Drew Green
21W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.31
3.5
Andrei Gregory
3W–5L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Dominic Lopez
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tom Hickman
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.25
Travis Donald
1W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.