Teams

Aranda/Boles

2026 Lubbock Adult Mixed League 18 & Over · 9.0 Adult Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-15vs Farris/IsomSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJack Williams / Mia Gonzalez vs Mel McRee / Shannon Isom5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesWhitney Rose Farquhar / Ian McDonald vs Trevor Paradoski / Hannah Quick6-1, 6-1
2026-07-08vs Farris/IsomWon 20
W#1 DoublesIan McDonald / Whitney Rose Farquhar vs Trevor Paradoski / Melissa Starck6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNathanael Boles / Mia Gonzalez vs Thomas Farris / Amy Gandy7-6, 6-2
2026-07-01vs Farris/IsomWon 30
W#1 DoublesMia Gonzalez / Nathanael Boles vs Melissa Starck / Trevor Paradoski2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChrystal Nickol Aranda / Ian McDonald vs Shannon Isom / Mel McRee6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGracelyn Anderson / Jack Williams vs Hannah Quick / Thomas Farris6-1, 7-6
2026-06-24vs Farris/IsomWon 21
W#1 DoublesJack Williams / Chrystal Nickol Aranda vs Thomas Farris / Hannah Quick6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesIan McDonald / Gracelyn Anderson vs Carson Bolton / Amy Gandy3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNathanael Boles / Whitney Rose Farquhar vs Mel McRee / Shannon Isom6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 9.0 Adult Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lott/King5111717151
2McCord3311718164
3Isom/Alvarez339921163
4Aranda/Boles1551329186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Jack Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
4.32
Chrystal Nickol Aranda
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.20
Ian McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
4.03
Nathanael Boles
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.90
Gracelyn Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Mia Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Whitney Rose Farquhar
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathanael Boles + Chrystal Nickol Aranda303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jack Williams
21W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
4.46
4.5
Chrystal Nickol Aranda
11W–8L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Ian McDonald
14W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Nathanael Boles
9W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
Gracelyn Anderson
30W–13L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
Mia Gonzalez
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Whitney Rose Farquhar
9W–0L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.