Teams

Elevate Dewitt B

Men's Interclub · B

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-18vs Manlius YMCA BLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesTim Hayes / Michael Henty vs Lawrence Martin / Richard Pascarella2-6, 3-6
2026-03-04Lost 01
L#1 Male SinglesTim Hayes vs Shay Smyth0-6, 3-6
2026-02-04Won 10
W#1 Male SinglesTim Hayes vs James Burgess6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for B have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Aaron Brown
usually #2 Male Doubles 47%, also #1 Male Doubles 47% · published 4
3.48
Kyle Voyer
usually #1 Male Doubles 92%, also #2 Male Doubles 8% · published 3.5
3.13
Daniel Kublick
published 3
2.57
Rudolph Boleslav
usually #2 Male Doubles 67%, also #1 Male Doubles 33% · published
Adam Ast
usually #2 Male Doubles 86%, also #1 Male Singles 14% · published
Jesse Daino
usually #1 Male Singles 71%, also #1 Male Doubles 14% · published
Kevin Seymour
published
Michael Hutchinson
published
Steve Pekich
published
Tim Hayes
usually #1 Male Singles 67%, also #1 Male Doubles 33% · published
Tom Muller
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aaron Brown
8W–22L career · type D · 15 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
3.5
Kyle Voyer
117W–50L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3
Daniel Kublick
5W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Rudolph Boleslav
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Adam Ast
2W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jesse Daino
22W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin Seymour
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Hutchinson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve Pekich
1W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tim Hayes
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tom Muller
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.