Teams

TOC.Swank

2025 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-06vs TOC.BarcinasLost 01
L#1 DoublesSally Willert / Sharon Fadelici vs Suzanne Jeska / Catie Cunningham4-6, 5-7
2025-09-20vs PW.BologaLost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Atkinson / Mary T Long vs Alicia Fitzpatrick / Priya Desai0-6, 1-6
2025-09-06vs TOC.ShuklaLost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Atkinson / Vinaya Verghese vs Lorraine Hall / Bryan Kern1-6, 3-6
2025-08-30vs MD.MerchantLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaureen Green / Holly Atkinson vs Karen Merchant / Lindsey Guccia2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSharon Fadelici / Audrey Hollett vs Angie Bostrom / Meredith Heath1-6, 1-6
2025-08-16vs KF.ScagnelliSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHolly Atkinson / Mary T Long vs Kristina Zeidler / Robyn Merck4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAudrey Hollett / Sharon Fadelici vs Kati Ray / Jennifer Hellrung6-1, 7-5
2025-08-09vs TOC.BarcinasLost 02
L#1 DoublesHolly Atkinson / Maureen Green vs Suzanne Jeska / Catie Cunningham5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Swank / Sharon Fadelici vs Bracha Blanc / Colleen McGowan4-6, 2-6
2025-08-02vs PW.BologaLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Swank / Sharon Fadelici vs Alexandra Dunn / Erin Schneider6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVinaya Verghese / Jennifer Johnson vs Alicia Fitzpatrick / Erin Horne3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Holly Atkinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Vinaya Verghese
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Sharon Fadelici
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.92
Lisa Swank
published
2.79
Audrey Hollett
published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
published
2.76
Sally Willert
published
2.75
Maureen Green
published
2.72
Sarah Rodriguez
published
2.72
Dana Briggs
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Hollett + Sharon Fadelici8650% games−1.1% vs expected
Vinaya Verghese + Holly Atkinson91150% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Holly Atkinson
252W–179L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Vinaya Verghese
111W–126L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Sharon Fadelici
183W–140L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Lisa Swank
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Audrey Hollett
33W–21L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Sally Willert
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Maureen Green
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Sarah Rodriguez
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
3
Dana Briggs
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.