Teams

APR-E RED

2025 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 8.5 - ITA

12 players · average NTRP 4.22 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-24vs WP GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Degitis / Nabeel Meghji vs Lynn Pearson / Adrian Johnson6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKelsey Berlin / David Tulloch vs Robert Shepard / Monica Marshall6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJanice Jensen / Armando Escalante vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-17vs CACM BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSanjana Chintalapudi / Shawn Iben vs Amy Springer / Chad Picard6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesVickor Robinson / Irina Suyumova vs Emily Mone / Ali Barghelame2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Degitis / Nabeel Meghji vs Lissa Moon / Jason Schrode6-1, 6-3
2025-08-10vs WP-O GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Hong / Andres Seijas vs Brooks Savage / Eleanor Savage6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNabeel Meghji / Michelle Degitis vs Gavin Berkey / Kyrianna Krzystek6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKelsey Berlin / David Tulloch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-03vs SKY BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesShawn Iben / Janice Jensen vs Tonya Laden / Paul Barrow6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristine Hong / David Tulloch vs Oliver Montoya / KC Nettleton6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVickor Robinson / Irina Suyumova vs Laura Montoya / GABRIEL MONTOYA6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-27vs GAC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesSanjana Chintalapudi / Armando Escalante vs Ben Hutchings / Reana Kaminsky0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Hong / Andres Seijas vs Daniel Green / Brooke Wagner6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKelsey Berlin / David Tulloch vs Claire Douthit / Navraj Heer4-6, 3-6
2025-07-20vs WP GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesShawn Iben / Janice Jensen vs Adrian Johnson / Monica Marshall6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Degitis / Nabeel Meghji vs Danny Somekh / Christina Carpenter6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesVickor Robinson / Irina Suyumova vs Brett Denkler / Emily Reinhart6-2, 6-2
2025-07-13vs CACM BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesKelsey Berlin / David Tulloch vs Linda Manhkhong / Chad Picard6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesArmando Escalante / Sanjana Chintalapudi vs Lissa Moon / Ben Atlee7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Hong / Andres Seijas vs Cydney Springer / Dirk McDermott4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · MIXED 8.5 - ITA
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1APR-E RED5214716152
2SS-LGT NAVY4211716148
3WP-O GOLD43101125212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Shawn Iben
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Michelle Degitis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Kelsey Berlin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
Irina Suyumova
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Christine Hong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.87
Andres Seijas
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Armando Escalante
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.84
Nabeel Meghji
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.84
Sanjana Chintalapudi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Janice Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
David Tulloch
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Vickor Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Degitis + Nabeel Meghji11261% games+2.9% vs expected
Shawn Iben + Kelsey Berlin8454% games+1.6% vs expected
Janice Jensen + Andres Seijas3647% games−1.1% vs expected
David Tulloch + Kelsey Berlin4451% gamesnot enough data
Sanjana Chintalapudi + Armando Escalante044 matchesnot enough data
Irina Suyumova + Vickor Robinson123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Degitis + Shawn Iben123 matchesnot enough data
Janice Jensen + Nabeel Meghji213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Shawn Iben
47W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Michelle Degitis
108W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
Kelsey Berlin
76W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
4
Irina Suyumova
97W–105L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
4.5
Christine Hong
37W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.89
4
Andres Seijas
99W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
4.5
Armando Escalante
14W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.86
4
Nabeel Meghji
86W–55L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Sanjana Chintalapudi
25W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
Janice Jensen
66W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
David Tulloch
28W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Vickor Robinson
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.