Teams

Montana/Vroman/55&Over

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Men 8.0 - 55 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-09vs 55 Q TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlan Hopkins / Enrique Osorio vs Dick Collum / Paul Larson6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJimmy Vroman / Dana Miller vs Mark Oja / Cary Burg6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKeith Polesky / Peter Teal vs Andy Hauser / Rick Davis6-3, 6-3
2025-08-09vs 55 Q TeamLost 12
L#1 DoublesJimmy Vroman / Dana Miller vs Andrew Lenssen / Paul Larson3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEnrique Osorio / Steve Saville vs Dick Collum / Cary Burg4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKeith Polesky / Peter Teal vs Mark Oja / Rick Davis6-3, 6-4
2025-08-08vs 55 Q TeamWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlan Hopkins / Keith Polesky vs Cary Burg / Mark Oja6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJimmy Vroman / Dana Miller vs Andy Hauser / Rick Davis2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEnrique Osorio / Steve Saville vs Dick Collum / Andrew Lenssen0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 8.0 - 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Vroman/55&Over21541088
255 Q Team12451080

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Alan Hopkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Dana Miller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Peter Teal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Jimmy Vroman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Enrique Osorio
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Keith Polesky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Saville
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jimmy Vroman + Enrique Osorio0522% games−11.2% vs expected
Jimmy Vroman + Dana Miller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alan Hopkins
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Dana Miller
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Peter Teal
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Jimmy Vroman
22W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Enrique Osorio
5W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keith Polesky
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Saville
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.