Teams

Ardea Insana

2024 Pinellas Combo 50 & Over Fall · 7.5 M Saturday

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-14vs RCSP FantauzzoLost 01
L#3 DoublesSteve Unger / Robert Hill vs Brian Stone / Ken Degen1-6, 1-6
2024-12-08vs Pinellas/Hollingsworth/50&Over7.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteve Unger / Robert Hill vs Chris Eversole / Peter Newman3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDane Houston / Bruce Insana vs Michael MacIntire / James Bettencourt2-6, 0-6
2024-12-07vs Seminole Lake DsaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDane Houston / Patrick LaLone vs Ken Ianni / Jonathan Thompson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTom Orr / Bruce Insana vs Randall Meisner / Chris Maddaloni6-7, 1-6
2024-11-23vs Pinellas/Hollingsworth/50&Over7.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesDane Houston / Patrick LaLone vs Michael MacIntire / James Bettencourt4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Unger / Bruce Insana vs Gorban Aliak / Chris Eversole1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDan McMullen / Charles Ankney vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Jack Korta5-7, 2-6
2024-11-09vs Seminole Lake DsaSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPatrick LaLone / Dane Houston vs Michael Issa / Randall Foster1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Ankney / Andrew Newman vs Chris Maddaloni / George Jacome3-6, 4-6
2024-11-02vs Pinellas/Hollingsworth/50&Over7.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesDane Houston / Patrick LaLone vs Bill Calafiura / Mark Nasworthy2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Unger / Robert Hill vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Gorban Aliak4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-21vs RCSP FantauzzoLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharles Ankney / Andrew Newman vs Alan Chin / Scott Rogers2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Hill / Steve Unger vs Brian Stone / Barry Michael4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Dane Houston
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.41
Jeff Sourini
published
3.38
Patrick LaLone
published
3.24
Steve Unger
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Philip Noll
published
3.13
Bruce Insana
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Charles Ankney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Steve Hueholt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Insana + Charles Ankney123 matchesnot enough data
Dane Houston + Steve Unger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dane Houston
155W–186L career · 5 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Jeff Sourini
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Patrick LaLone
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Steve Unger
105W–84L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
Philip Noll
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Bruce Insana
48W–91L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Charles Ankney
53W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
Steve Hueholt
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.