Teams

KY/LOU/GIE/WISSING

2025 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-27vs KY/LOU/DIEHLLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlex Steen / Michael Weisberg vs Matthew Bunnell / Brian Belva2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJonathan Butler vs Elijah Brown1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEric Elliott / Samuel McClain vs Brad Eckmann / John Diehl7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Alex Steen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Michael Weisberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Jonathan Butler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.18
Jacob Lewis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.14
David Zuhars
published 3.5
3.12
Stephen Brooks
published
3.11
Thomas Solinger
published
3.11
Gung-Min Gie
published
3.08
Eric Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Samuel McClain
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Michael Settles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Michael Smolinski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.86
Paul Jordan
published
2.84
Patrick Wissing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Todd Mehaffey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Todd Mehaffey + Patrick Wissing5447% games−1.4% vs expected
Samuel McClain + Eric Elliott1440% gamesnot enough data
Michael Weisberg + Jonathan Butler303 matchesnot enough data
Alex Steen + Jacob Lewis303 matchesnot enough data
Gung-Min Gie + Jonathan Butler123 matchesnot enough data
Gung-Min Gie + Jacob Lewis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alex Steen
20W–10L career · type D · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Michael Weisberg
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Jonathan Butler
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jacob Lewis
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
David Zuhars
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Stephen Brooks
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Thomas Solinger
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Gung-Min Gie
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
Eric Elliott
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
Samuel McClain
25W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
Michael Settles
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Michael Smolinski
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Paul Jordan
7W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Patrick Wissing
26W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Todd Mehaffey
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.