Teams

BROADSTONE RC 55AW8.0A

2024 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

15 players · average NTRP / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Tammy Obrien
published
3.94
Karen Quidachay
published
3.94
Jen Huang
published
3.91
Laurie Schofield
published
3.80
Terry Sandoval
published
3.78
Holly Pon
published
3.76
Jennifer Mattos
published
3.75
Kelly Follett
published
3.70
Jamie Ramsey
published
3.70
Regina Infelise
published
3.70
Tami Thorson
published
3.53
Patrice Gran
published
3.52
Elaine Yap
published
3.44
Soo Pae
published
Jill A Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Schofield + Holly Pon4161% games+3.1% vs expected
Regina Infelise + Jennifer Mattos7355% games+1.8% vs expected
Tammy Obrien + Jennifer Mattos6360% gamesnot enough data
Jamie Ramsey + Tammy Obrien213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Obrien
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.97
Karen Quidachay
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.94
Jen Huang
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.94
Laurie Schofield
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
Terry Sandoval
19W–24L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Holly Pon
19W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Jennifer Mattos
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
Kelly Follett
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Jamie Ramsey
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
Regina Infelise
20W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
Tami Thorson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Patrice Gran
25W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
Elaine Yap
21W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Soo Pae
23W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Jill A Thompson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.