Teams

TCSP-Full Metal Rackets-Steck

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-02-25vs PL-The Volley Llamas-SmallWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Bethurum / Carrie Morris vs Elisha Logue / Jo James6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSuzie Heid vs Yasmina Bahi4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMargaret Steck / Mary Ransom vs Eloisa Tang / Xiaobei Li0-6, 4-6
2023-02-19vs NWW-CP-van ZylLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarrie Morris / Mary Ransom vs Katie van Zyl / Tracy Brodahl4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSuzie Heid vs Jessica Zhi3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Engrav / Tzu-Chin Lin vs Linda Benenato / Lisa Kerslake6-2, 6-2
2023-02-12vs ETC-DavisLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarrie Morris / Rhonda Bethurum vs Melissa Davis / Alysson Bashey6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTeresa Engrav vs Hillary Peterman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTara Nelson / Christine Henn vs Dawn Klinghoffer / Jane Yeh4-6, 3-6
2023-02-04vs BAIN-The Slice Girls-CarrilloWon 30
W#1 DoublesTzu-Chin Lin / Carrie Morris vs Shannon Fitzgerald / Jennifer Carrillo6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTeresa Engrav vs Elizabeth Bergan6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTara Nelson / Christine Henn vs Pondra Perkins / Tara Moyer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-01-28vs BC-Double Trouble-CarlisleWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarrie Rosenthal / Lori Lindsay vs Tanya Rizzo / Erin Park2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTeresa Engrav vs Niveen Heaton6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRhonda Bethurum / Suzie Heid vs Dana Brown / Natalie Banks6-2, 6-2
2023-01-22vs TCSP-SpainWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarrie Rosenthal / Carrie Morris vs Sara Javid / Jill Walzer6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSuzie Heid vs Anne Manicone7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRhonda Bethurum / Christine Henn vs Suzanne Kalberer / Lisa Williamson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-01-14vs NWW-WSC-Raquettes-OnuWon 21
L#1 DoublesTeresa Engrav / Geeta McCormack vs Irina Salvan / Irinel Crivat3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesCarrie Morris vs Margaret Landry-Navarro5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRhonda Bethurum / Margaret Steck vs Maria Smintina / Geanina Andreiu6-2, 6-0
2023-01-07vs PL-The Volley Llamas-SmallLost 12
W#1 DoublesTeresa Engrav / Rhonda Bethurum vs Lisa Small / Eloisa Tang6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSuzie Heid vs Yasmina Bahi3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Steck / Mary Ransom vs Connie Chou / Mary Lane3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christine Henn
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.65
Geeta McCormack
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
Teresa Engrav
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Margaret Steck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Mary Ransom
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Rhonda Bethurum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.51
Carrie Morris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.50
Suzie Heid
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Carrie Rosenthal
published 2.5
Erin Mahony
published
Lori Lindsay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tara Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tzu-Chin Lin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Geeta McCormack + Tzu-Chin Lin2356% games+10.1% vs expected
Margaret Steck + Rhonda Bethurum2351% games+4.7% vs expected
Christine Henn + Carrie Morris7454% games+4.2% vs expected
Tara Nelson + Christine Henn2639% games+0.4% vs expected
Margaret Steck + Christine Henn1835% games−3.2% vs expected
Geeta McCormack + Carrie Morris2537% games−7.8% vs expected
Erin Mahony + Margaret Steck2440% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Steck + Geeta McCormack1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christine Henn
41W–85L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Geeta McCormack
35W–85L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Teresa Engrav
58W–69L career · type A · 8 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Margaret Steck
27W–67L career · 6 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
Mary Ransom
15W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Rhonda Bethurum
28W–28L career · 6 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Carrie Morris
53W–73L career · 10 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Suzie Heid
41W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Carrie Rosenthal
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Erin Mahony
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Lindsay
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Tara Nelson
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tzu-Chin Lin
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.