Teams

Spring WACETTES 2025

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5 WD

16 players · average NTRP 3.39 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Natalie Chesed
published
3.41
Patti Wilson
published
3.37
Laura Mealer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Deva May
published 3.5
3.22
Kim Tavasoli
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Patti McNamara
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Lynda Balletta
published
3.10
Renae Saliano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Mary Feldstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Monica List
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Robyn Russak
published
2.95
Lesley Moverley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Selina Cheng
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Kim Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Arlene Braun
published 3
Marilyn Hewitson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Tavasoli + Patti Wilson3249% games+8.0% vs expected
Patti Wilson + Deva May4256% games−0.0% vs expected
Renae Saliano + Mary Feldstein202547% games−7.9% vs expected
Monica List + Patti McNamara111146% games−8.1% vs expected
Robyn Russak + Lynda Balletta2443% games−12.7% vs expected
Renae Saliano + Patti McNamara71045% gamesnot enough data
Kim Tavasoli + Patti McNamara4746% gamesnot enough data
Laura Mealer + Renae Saliano2644% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Chesed
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.53
Patti Wilson
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Laura Mealer
88W–86L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Deva May
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Kim Tavasoli
85W–106L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Patti McNamara
90W–99L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Lynda Balletta
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Renae Saliano
88W–116L career · 1 line in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Mary Feldstein
59W–89L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Monica List
45W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Robyn Russak
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Lesley Moverley
28W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Selina Cheng
54W–92L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Kim Spencer
25W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Arlene Braun
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Marilyn Hewitson
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.