Teams

Ly.Longest55C

2025 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-22vs Ka.Serow55C5.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Sally Sikes vs Karen Blume / Maria Riemann0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJeanne Russell / Kendra Gladwin vs Debra Allen / Jill Rhim6-1, 6-1
2025-09-08vs Ka.Serow55C5.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanne Russell / Lacey Seaton vs Kathleen Serow / Maria Riemann2-6, 3-6
2025-08-25vs Ka.Serow55C5.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Kendra Gladwin vs Karen Blume / Darsan Russo1-6, 0-6
2025-08-18vs Ka.Serow55C5.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanne Russell / Sally Sikes vs Darsan Russo / Kathleen Serow5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-11vs Ka.Serow55C5.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeanne Russell / Kendra Gladwin vs Karen Blume / Randi Rosen6-4, 7-6
2025-08-04vs Ka.Serow55C5.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Sally Sikes vs Martha Lempicke / Gwen Coyte3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Jeanne Russell
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Ellen Werner
published 3
2.69
Joanna Valler
published
2.55
Priscilla Nanney
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.50
Lavonne Moore
published
2.44
Lynn Longest
published
2.43
Susan Lavrack
published
2.42
Sally Sikes
published
2.40
Kendra Gladwin
published
2.30
Cosette Philpot
published 3
2.00
Terry Marcott
published
Sierra Luz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Russell + Priscilla Nanney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jeanne Russell
78W–86L career · 12 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Ellen Werner
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joanna Valler
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Priscilla Nanney
41W–122L career · 5 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Lavonne Moore
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Lynn Longest
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Susan Lavrack
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.43
Sally Sikes
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
Kendra Gladwin
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.40
3
Cosette Philpot
30W–74L career · type A · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.30
Terry Marcott
2W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Sierra Luz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.