← Teams

SHC-Timberlake

2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 2.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Alma Siri
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Tom Church-Adams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Joseph Siri
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Rufus Timberlake
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Susanne Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Nina Church-Adams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Pete Baughman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Dave Gillard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Karla Hendrickson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.34
Carmen Timberlake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.25
ROSS GREEN
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2023-03-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCarmen Timberlake / Rufus Timberlake vs Lani Chu - (DQ) / Larry Van6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoseph Siri / Milla Woller vs Tri Pham / Lei Ma6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesROSS GREEN / Jennifer Cox vs THAO VAN / Johan Hong6-0, 6-4
2023-03-03Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesSusanne Cochran / Pete Baughman vs Mubashir Cheema / Anne Larson6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlma Siri / Joseph Siri vs Kalpana Berman / Henri Cross6-1, 6-2
2023-02-26Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesROSS GREEN / Karla Hendrickson vs Heather Davidson / Dave Ostby3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-02-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCarmen Timberlake / Rufus Timberlake vs Frank Brown / Shuping Li6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNina Church-Adams / Tom Church-Adams vs Hien Lu / Holly Twain6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAlma Siri / ROSS GREEN vs Jared Shipley / Patty Chen6-1, 7-5
2023-02-05Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTom Church-Adams / Nina Church-Adams vs Matt Curtis / Jean Jensen6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlma Siri / Joseph Siri vs Jay Hopson / Debbie Ackroyd6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarmen Timberlake / Dave Gillard vs Gary Hallmark / Ellen Wood6-3, 7-6
2023-02-03Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKarla Hendrickson / Dave Gillard vs Thomas Croll / Erin Dineen7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPete Baughman / Susanne Cochran vs Sally Papadimas / Arturo Barroso7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarmen Timberlake / Rufus Timberlake vs Gabriel Barroso Mendoza / Angela Diaz de Leon6-1, 6-2
2023-01-13Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJoseph Siri / Alma Siri vs William Seidl / Jennifer Johnson7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTom Church-Adams / Nina Church-Adams vs Michael Gentry / Kate Quisling6-3, 6-4
2023-01-08Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDave Gillard / Susanne Cochran vs Matt Curtis / Jean Jensen6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNina Church-Adams / Tom Church-Adams vs Fred Buller / Peg McClendon6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Alma Siri
71W–37L career
0%70%30%
3.54
3
Tom Church-Adams
32W–25L career
0%58%42%
3.07
3
Joseph Siri
45W–38L career
0%91%9%
2.92
3
Rufus Timberlake
23W–35L career
1%86%13%
2.89
3
Susanne Cochran
82W–68L career
1%98%1%
2.78
3
Nina Church-Adams
12W–22L career
not enough data
—
3
Pete Baughman
13W–16L career · type S
8%91%1%
2.70
3
Dave Gillard
36W–41L career
6%94%0%
2.67
3
Karla Hendrickson
41W–109L career
18%82%0%
2.56
2.5
Carmen Timberlake
43W–76L career
0%76%24%
2.34
2.5
ROSS GREEN
11W–33L career
0%93%7%
2.25

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.