Teams

*1-SClark-Eno

2024 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-02vs *3-VStiebris-HS-55 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Pigora / Carl Laird vs Valdis Stiebris / David Stefan7-5, 7-5
2024-04-25vs *4-NBuckley-HRWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarl Laird / Bert Clancey vs Richard Bolduc / John Lockhead6-4, 6-4
2024-04-11vs *6-RGildehaus-YMCA-55Lost 02
L#2 DoublesSteve Pigora / Frank Veno vs Michael Meyers / David Hubacher5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarl Laird / Jeff Huxtable vs Sergei Krasnyanski / Stephen Vanderhoof3-6, 4-6
2024-04-04vs *2-SRyan-CHTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesGlen Hacker / Steve Pigora vs Steve Dischinger / Doug Kopec5-7, 4-6
2024-03-21vs *4-NBuckley-HRLost 01
L#3 DoublesFrank Veno / Carl Laird vs Greg Duncan / Tim McMahon4-6, 1-6
2024-03-14vs *5-RKern-CHTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFrank Veno / Carl Laird vs T Powell / Mike Hickey3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGlen Hacker / Steve Pigora vs Andy Cohen / Robert Kern6-3, 7-6
2024-02-29vs *2-SRyan-CHTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarl Laird / Brian Bornstein vs Stephen Ryan / Bob Stocking3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Pigora / Philip Chang vs Gary Glish / Randy Cubrilovic5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Andy Holloman
published 3.5
3.25
Steve Pigora
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Glen Hacker
published 3.5
3.13
Jeff Huxtable
published
3.08
Bert Clancey
published 3.5
2.84
Carl Laird
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Brian Bornstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Pigora + Glen Hacker314 matchesnot enough data
Steve Pigora + Andy Holloman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andy Holloman
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Steve Pigora
93W–110L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Glen Hacker
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Jeff Huxtable
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Bert Clancey
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Carl Laird
42W–77L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
Brian Bornstein
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.