Teams

Williamson, Greg

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Men 8.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs Do, DawsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesHall Ratcliffe / Travis Finseth vs Zackery Presnall / Chandler Strain0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Foreman / Kevin McKay vs Loren Eaton / Chris Stevens3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNeal Stephens / Albert Smith vs James Williams / Anthony Covington6-4, 6-2
2026-08-03vs Do, DawsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Stacy / Greg Williamson vs Dawson Do / Chandler Strain4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNeal Stephens / Clayton Muller vs Loren Eaton / Anthony Covington1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesHall Ratcliffe / Albert Smith vs Zackery Presnall / Chris Stevens3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 8.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Do, Dawson1142451
2Williamson, Greg0103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Albert Smith
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Clayton Muller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Kevin McKay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Travis Finseth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Greg Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Tim Mask
published
Hall Ratcliffe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kevin Dupont
published
Matthew Stacy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Neal Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
William Foreman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin McKay + Travis Finseth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Albert Smith
21W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Clayton Muller
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
Kevin McKay
17W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Travis Finseth
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
Greg Williamson
9W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Tim Mask
4W–20L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.08
Hall Ratcliffe
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin Dupont
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Stacy
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Neal Stephens
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Foreman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.