Teams

Kilauea Braves

2022 Ekolu 18 and Over League · 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.44 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-08vs Mid-Court CrisisLost 01
L#1 Mixed DoublesSteve Bonner / Sharyl Shultz vs Alan Cheung / Maureen O'Guin1-6, 1-6
2022-09-24vs Rapid ResponseLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesJhoanna Mabutas / Sharyl Shultz vs Karen Chen / Amanda Soliven0-6, 0-6
L#1 Mixed DoublesAce-Kamakani Inouye / Regina Chang vs EDWARD WALAWENDER / Christina Doane2-6, 2-6
2022-09-17vs PTTLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesConnie Zeng / Regina Chang vs Ronda Sagara / Sheri Mock1-6, 1-6
2022-09-10vs Tennis Hall of Framers - 6.0Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesErika Jodloman / Regina Chang vs Shana Suzuki / Kathleen Rubio6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-27vs Ty1On6.0Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesSharyl Shultz / Jhoanna Mabutas vs Jennifer Ostachuk / Olia Lu0-6, 0-6
2022-08-13vs CMBLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesRegina Chang / Courtney Lin vs Terri Mei / Kimberly Tamashiro1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ty's Breakers 6.08123411146
2Tennis Hall of Framers - 6.08121614179
3CMB63141329210
4ACL & Hiro54141326202
5Rapid Response36111632234
6Kilauea Braves1881940263
7Ty1On6.00932448298

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Erika Jodloman
published 4
3.72
Madeleine Dreith
published 4
3.35
Eugene Hatakeyama
published 3.5
3.34
Ted Kobayashi
published
3.32
Regina Chang
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jacob Marutani
published 3.5
3.21
Ace-Kamakani Inouye
published 3.5
3.14
Gordon Li
published 3.5
Courtney Lin
published 3
2.20
Jhoanna Mabutas
published
2.14
Sharyl Shultz
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Connie Zeng
published
Jason Yoshioka
published
Steve Bonner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jhoanna Mabutas + Sharyl Shultz0523% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erika Jodloman
46W–26L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Madeleine Dreith
58W–40L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Eugene Hatakeyama
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Ted Kobayashi
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
3.34
3.5
Regina Chang
25W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Jacob Marutani
2W–4L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Ace-Kamakani Inouye
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Gordon Li
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
3
Courtney Lin
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jhoanna Mabutas
3W–18L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Sharyl Shultz
12W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Connie Zeng
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jason Yoshioka
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steve Bonner
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.