Teams

Cathy & Willy

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.57 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-02-27vs King RichardLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarco Terracciano / Aracelis Bell vs NOEL LASTIMOSO / Fledz Lastimoso1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Stone / Chris Love vs Jonathon Taylor / Nancy Scheetz-Freymiller2-6, 4-6
2022-02-06vs Team 7Lost 12
W#1 DoublesWilly Stone / Brook Connolly vs Triin Minton / Maverick Yabut1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCurtis Nelson / Penny Rohacek vs Marlys Morton / Adam Choi4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCatherine Stone / Chris Love vs Ryan Jaramillo / Emily Elison2-6, 1-6
2022-01-29vs ConitaWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrook Connolly / Willy Stone vs Christy Lee / BOHYUN BAHNG6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAracelis Bell / Marco Terracciano vs Conita Mullett / Douglas Henie6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Curtis Nelson vs Song Bliss / Grant Keyes6-0, 6-3
2022-01-23vs I can't believe they're not 4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMarco Terracciano / Aracelis Bell vs Phuripak Sukanthanag / Walaiporn Sukanthanag2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCurtis Nelson / Penny Rohacek vs John Carlson / Cheevarat Wongsaree0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChris Love / Catherine Stone vs Anthony Brooks / Saharra McKee5-7, 2-6
2022-01-16vs Brock LobstersWon 21
W#1 DoublesAracelis Bell / Marco Terracciano vs Jessie Lief / Zachary Vincent6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Curtis Nelson vs Dana Griffin / Andre Lief5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBrook Connolly / Willy Stone vs Chloe Cotton / William Cotton6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-09vs Mystery Team 7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Curtis Nelson vs Barbara Jacobs / PAUL RISSE6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCatherine Stone / Chris Love vs Julie Raymond-Yakoubian / Brenden Raymond-Yakoubian6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Catherine Stone
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Curtis Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Marco Terracciano
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
Chris Love
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Brook Connolly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Willy Stone
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.67
Penny Rohacek
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Aracelis Bell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Stone + Willy Stone21858% games+13.8% vs expected
Marco Terracciano + Aracelis Bell3354% games+3.0% vs expected
Curtis Nelson + Penny Rohacek6555% gamesnot enough data
Willy Stone + Aracelis Bell3350% gamesnot enough data
Willy Stone + Brook Connolly303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Stone
189W–51L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Curtis Nelson
72W–65L career · 9 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Marco Terracciano
67W–44L career · 7 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Chris Love
3W–18L career · type T · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Brook Connolly
36W–22L career · type M · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Willy Stone
110W–70L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Penny Rohacek
49W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
0
Aracelis Bell
21W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.