Teams

BGT:Beverly G&T Green:von Hippel

2022 EMA Adult 65 & Over Women · 8.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-27vs BGT:Beverly G&T:Blue:HartnettLost 03
L#1 DoublesDorcas Miller / Carol Mustone vs Peggy Dixon / Leslie Ann Howell4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSharon Black / Anne Parker vs Barbara Rawlsky Willett / N Joan Murray6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRuth Birnberg / Margaret Harvey vs Penny Pounder / Catharine Hayes3-6, 2-5
2022-06-20vs BGT:Beverly G&T:Blue:HartnettLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Jane Waite / Carol Mustone vs Sarah Maynard / Sandra Dick7-6, 5-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFaith Moore / Ruth Birnberg vs Catharine Hayes / Judy Fledderjohn2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLida Lloyd / Jessie von Hippel vs Barbara Rawlsky Willett / N Joan Murray4-6, 5-7
2022-06-13vs BGT:Beverly G&T:Blue:HartnettLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Jane Waite / Dorcas Miller vs Penny Pounder / Melissa Gerrity0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAnne Parker / Margaret Harvey vs Catharine Hayes / Judy Fledderjohn3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHenrietta Gates / Susan Mcanneny vs Sarah Maynard / Bernice Hartnett6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-06-06vs BGT:Beverly G&T:Blue:HartnettLost 03
L#1 DoublesLida Lloyd / Dorcas Miller vs Melissa Gerrity / Penny Pounder0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRuth Birnberg / Faith Moore vs Peggy Dixon / Sandra Dick6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Mcanneny / Jessie von Hippel vs Bernice Hartnett / Leslie Ann Howell4-6, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BGT:Beverly G&T:Blue:Hartnett04120383
2BGT:Beverly G&T Green:von Hippel0401224146

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Mary Jane Waite
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Carol Mustone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Faith Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Henrietta Gates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jessie von Hippel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lida Lloyd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Margaret Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Ruth Birnberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Black
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Mcanneny
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruth Birnberg + Susan Mcanneny044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Jane Waite
50W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Carol Mustone
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Faith Moore
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Henrietta Gates
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jessie von Hippel
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lida Lloyd
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Margaret Harvey
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruth Birnberg
28W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Black
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Susan Mcanneny
3W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.