Teams

Conradi/40/4.5/WN/OCC

2025 LAF Adult 40 & Over - Women Night · 4.5 LAF (40&O) Women Night

9 players · average NTRP 4.33 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-08vs Payton/40/4.5/WN/BEVRLost 03
L#1 SinglesSherry Wilson vs Suellyn Charbonnet5-8
L#2 DoublesAshley Guidry / Donna Briley vs Kimmie Cormier / Amanda Latiolais6-8
L#3 DoublesClaire Burgess / Ruth Larimer vs Keri Delhomme / Erin Munoz2-8
2025-03-31vs Payton/40/4.5/WN/BEVRLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Guidry / Sherry Wilson vs Ashley Rust / Lauren Bourgeois6-8
W#2 DoublesChristi Brignac / Janice Searle vs Erin Munoz / Keri Delhomme9-8
L#3 DoublesRuth Larimer / Claire Burgess vs Christine Payton / Bonnie E McDonald4-8
2025-03-31vs Payton/40/4.5/WN/BEVRLost 04
L#1 DoublesChristi Brignac / Janice Searle vs Ashley Rust / Lauren Bourgeois4-8
L#1 SinglesSherry Wilson vs Jennifer Marine3-8
L#2 DoublesClaire Burgess / Ruth Larimer vs Christine Payton / Bonnie E McDonald1-8
L#3 DoublesDonna Briley / Ashley Guidry vs Amanda Latiolais / Kimmie Cormier4-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 LAF (40&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christi Brignac
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.02
Claire Burgess
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Ashley Guidry
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Vallery Albritton
published
3.79
Donna Briley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Ruth Larimer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Sherry Wilson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Janice Searle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Michele Howell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Burgess + Vallery Albritton134 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Larimer + Donna Briley123 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Larimer + Claire Burgess033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christi Brignac
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Claire Burgess
13W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Ashley Guidry
2W–4L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.96
Vallery Albritton
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Donna Briley
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Ruth Larimer
21W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Sherry Wilson
18W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Janice Searle
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Michele Howell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.