Teams

SATL18/RJablonski/SAC

USTA Adult 18 & Over (3.0-4.0, 9.0) · Men - 3.0

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Mason / Jordan Bray vs Josh Martin / Justin Brown2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-04vs SATL18/TBrown/SHSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDaniel Mason / Jordan Bray vs Thomas Brown / John Morris5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRyan Jablonski / Nelson Rivera vs David Jung / Donald Wilds6-3, 6-1
2026-04-27Won 10
W#2 SinglesDaniel Mason vs Jacob Poag6-1, 6-2
2026-04-18vs SATL18/TBrown/SHSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRyan Jablonski / Anthony Catalano vs Thomas Brown / Grant Griffin4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Mason / Jordan Bray vs David Jung / Zach Corbitt6-0, 6-3
2026-04-06vs SATL18/Kudipudi/BSMSWon 20
W#1 DoublesRyan Jablonski / Anthony Catalano vs Surya Kudipudi / Pradeep Reddy3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Mason / Jordan Bray vs Eric Mohrmann / Jacob Poag6-2, 6-4
2026-03-30Won 10
W#2 SinglesRyan Jablonski vs Noah Bradley7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-23vs SATL18/TBrown/SHSLost 01
L#1 DoublesRyan Jablonski / Miguel Villarreal vs Jason Nix / John Morris6-7, 0-0
2026-03-18vs SATL18/Kudipudi/BSMSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRyan Jablonski / Miguel Villarreal vs Prakash Bathini / Pradeep Reddy3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Mason / Jordan Bray vs Zachary Princell / Eric Mohrmann4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesRyan Jablonski / Miguel Villarreal vs Josh Martin / Noah Bradley6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Men - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SATL18/Kudipudi/BSMS62201227267
2SATL18/TBrown/SHS62191330258
3SATL18/JMartin/GaffneyHS36152145343
4SATL18/RJablonski/SAC27142249368

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Daniel Mason
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.85
Rich Proctor
published
2.81
Ryan Jablonski
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daniel Mason
22W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Rich Proctor
9W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
Ryan Jablonski
5W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.