← Teams

CAC-Birkhofer

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Liz DelPlato
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Penny Birkhofer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Barbara Adams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Katherine Kralj
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.63
Donna Roisom
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Crystal Bryant
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.36
Michele Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Lisa Clevenger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2021-11-14Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesBarbara Adams / Michele Snyder vs Alison Davis / Stacy Hawkins Parker6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLiz DelPlato / Katherine Kralj vs Catherine Go / Heidi Wilcox6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2021-11-13Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Lucas / Donna Roisom vs Nikki Nadig / Jenny Pizot6-3, 6-2
2021-10-23Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBarbara Adams / Michele Snyder vs Michi VanGrunsven / RENEE VANDEGRIEND6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Liz DelPlato vs Pamela Buckley / Laura Webb6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDonna Roisom / Jennifer Lucas vs Carol Chiu / Linda Barr6-1, 6-4
2021-10-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLiz DelPlato / Katherine Kralj vs Flor Harrigan / Takumi Koyama6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Rise Hawley vs Cheryl Roloff / Deanna Peterson6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPenny Birkhofer / Lisa Clevenger vs Angie Lee / Karen Dellinger6-3, 6-3
2021-10-10Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRise Hawley / Katherine Kralj vs Kristen Fisher / Darcy Moore6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Adams / Michele Snyder vs Susan Branam / Anita Havemann6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPenny Birkhofer / Crystal Bryant vs Gwen Matthews / Chrys Culver1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-10-03Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesLiz DelPlato / Katherine Kralj vs Timothea Barnatan / Ellen Hodges6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBarbara Adams / Michele Snyder vs Julie Hansen / Irena Ilcheva6-1, 6-2
2021-09-25Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLiz DelPlato / Katherine Kralj vs Carrie Fisher / Joelle Lewis6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPenny Birkhofer / Cathryn Hansen vs Nancy Atkins / Karen McNairy6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Kari Martin vs Colleen Hamilton / Lisa West6-0, 6-3
2021-09-19Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesLiz DelPlato / Katherine Kralj vs Mary Elliott / Kathleen Goodfriend7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPenny Birkhofer / Lisa Clevenger vs Linda Paulk / Deirdre Harms6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Kari Martin vs Nina Sanna / Janet Walker7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Liz DelPlato
124W–99L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Penny Birkhofer
68W–50L career
not enough data
—
4
Barbara Adams
13W–16L career
15%83%2%
3.68
4
Katherine Kralj
142W–116L career
6%94%0%
3.63
4
Donna Roisom
100W–85L career
9%91%0%
3.63
4
Crystal Bryant
105W–117L career
24%76%0%
3.53
3.5
Michele Snyder
149W–123L career
0%97%2%
3.36
3.5
Lisa Clevenger
25W–50L career
0%98%1%
3.32

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.