Teams

3 TCRC Gibson 40Aces

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.93 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-16vs 2 Raintree Middle Aged WarriorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Zollinhofer / Brad Houff vs ED Fuhr / Eddie Parker6-2, 6-4
2023-07-11vs 5 Woodlake MossWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Zollinhofer / Brad Houff vs Michael Cabral / Ken Patterson6-4, 6-3
2023-07-02vs 7 Westwood Nilson Icy-HotzWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndy Tucker / Brian Zollinhofer vs Samuel Highfill / Nathan Lord7-5, 6-1
2023-07-01vs 1 ACAC HollomonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Pope / Brian Zollinhofer vs Majd Babik / Christopher Chandler6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAric Mueller / Brian Zollinhofer vs Matt Sebetic / Jeffrey Blasko6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-11vs 9 MRTC FinnWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Preservati / Brad Houff vs Charlie Wilson / Michael Blackburn6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-10vs 4 Lakeside HowellLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndy Tucker / Brad Houff vs Brian Cooper / Jay Abbud6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrian Zollinhofer vs LUDINEI PICELLI1-6, 1-6
2023-06-03vs 8 MTC Stephens ResurgenceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Pope / Brian Zollinhofer vs Douglas Scammell / Patrick Survello6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrad Houff / Tim Parks vs Philip Rackliffe / Jerry Cole1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Brian Zollinhofer
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.78
James Dunton
published 4
3.77
Aric Mueller
published 4
Andy Tucker
published 4
3.61
Tim Parks
published
3.59
Brad Houff
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.34
Robert Preservati
published
3.32
Ravi Ravichandran
published
3.18
Don Ha
published 3.5
3.04
Bo Bowden
published 3.5
Jeffrey Pope
published
Nat Draper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Houff + Brian Zollinhofer12560% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Zollinhofer
212W–79L career · 7 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
James Dunton
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Aric Mueller
13W–18L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Andy Tucker
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Parks
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Brad Houff
114W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Robert Preservati
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.34
Ravi Ravichandran
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Don Ha
15W–27L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Bo Bowden
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.04
Jeffrey Pope
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nat Draper
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.