Teams

LEECHAR/Ramsey/40&Over7.0MXD

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 7.0 X

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesSally Loessner / Robert Morgan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-15vs Vivante - MadeanLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Brown / Sally Loessner vs Judy Roberts / Carl Peterson1-6, 3-6
2025-02-08vs UTC - SolisWon 30
W#1 DoublesCR Boll / Amy Lewis vs Diane Meyers / Jason Feeley6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobert Morgan / Sara Aiello vs Regina Lookis / Kevin Lookis6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTHOMAS SCHREIER / Colleen Scholtes vs Tia Olivolo / Tony Weiler6-2, 7-5
2025-02-01vs The Place - WagnerLost 01
L#2 DoublesTony Bond / Sally Loessner vs Jack Akova / Wendy Olek4-6, 2-6
2025-01-25vs Lake Kennedy - RiccioWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Brown / Sally Loessner vs Jeffrey Wheeler / Jan Wheeler7-6, 7-6
2025-01-18vs Babcock National - JichaWon 10
W#3 DoublesSally Loessner / Robert Morgan vs Linda Revis / Ronald Revis6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 X have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Hilary Cole
published
3.44
Sally Loessner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
CR Boll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Christine Kehrli
published 3.5
3.22
Colleen Scholtes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Amy Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Tony Bond
published
Jennifer Andrews
published
John Brown
published
Robert Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sara Aiello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne McAuliffe
published
THOMAS SCHREIER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Trip Vanroden
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Andrews + CR Boll033 matchesnot enough data
Hilary Cole + CR Boll303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hilary Cole
18W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.59
3.5
Sally Loessner
61W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
CR Boll
6W–3L career · type M · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Christine Kehrli
3W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Colleen Scholtes
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Amy Lewis
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Tony Bond
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Jennifer Andrews
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Brown
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Morgan
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sara Aiello
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne McAuliffe
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
THOMAS SCHREIER
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Trip Vanroden
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.