Teams

Net Girlz

2022 Prince Georges Adult 55 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.42 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-06vs LoVV 55 PlusSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTeri Hudson / Beverly Rouse vs Shelley Puterman / Mary Beth Etherton7-6, 4-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesClaris Brock / Gwendolyn Vauss vs Jonya Wagner / Terri Windsor6-3, 7-6
2022-07-30vs Different StrokesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly White / Rosalie Hooper vs Gwen Brown / Stephanie Marshall6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesClaris Brock / Annette James vs Connie Marable / Rebecca Sellassie5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2022-07-24vs LoVV 55 PlusLost 02
L#1 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Andrea Motley vs Bernadette Walker / Mary Beth Etherton0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClaris Brock / Gwendolyn Vauss vs Sheila Jennings / Denise Freeman7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2022-07-17vs Different StrokesWon 10
W#1 DoublesTeri Hudson / Beverly Rouse vs Gwen Brown / Stephanie Marshall6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-16vs LoVV 55 PlusWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaris Brock / Donna Jones vs Shelley Puterman / Mary Beth Etherton2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Motley / Rosalie Hooper vs Sherri Colston / Tammy Press6-0, 6-2
2022-07-11vs Different StrokesWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaris Brock / Donna Jones vs Marsha Williams / Janice Pegram-Lewis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Andrea Motley vs Donna Garland / Gwen Brown6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Claris Brock
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.43
Teri Hudson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
Maureen Cook
published
Andrea Motley
published 3.5
3.18
Rosalie Hooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Kimberly White
published
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
2.34
Gwendolyn Vauss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Hudson + Claris Brock7550% games+0.3% vs expected
Gwendolyn Vauss + Claris Brock2445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claris Brock
420W–275L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
4
Teri Hudson
129W–96L career · 2 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
Maureen Cook
21W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Andrea Motley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Rosalie Hooper
188W–181L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Kimberly White
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Gwendolyn Vauss
43W–122L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.