Teams

S OR-ESTC-Williams

2025 ADULT 18 & Over · 5.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 5.00 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-07vs EW-PFC-WilberdingLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley Spencer / Madalyn Williams vs Rachel Aldridge / Kasey Knox Wilberding4-8
L#1 SinglesSaryn Mooney vs Gracie Smyley1-8
L#2 DoublesSharon Bellusci / Sarah Kelly vs Ekaterina Burduli / Scout Mathews5-8
2025-06-07vs EW-PFC-WilberdingWon 21
W#1 DoublesTrudie Puskedra / Madalyn Williams vs Kristin Larson / Maggie Fiocchi8-1
W#1 SinglesKimber Stovesand vs Kathleen Stevens8-1
L#2 DoublesSharon Bellusci / Sarah Kelly vs Kasey Knox Wilberding / Scout Mathews1-8
2025-06-07vs EW-PFC-WilberdingWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaisey Lee Emery / Madalyn Williams vs Kristin Larson / Maggie Fiocchi8-2
W#1 SinglesKimber Stovesand vs Kathleen Stevens8-3
L#2 DoublesSharon Bellusci / Sarah Kelly vs Kasey Knox Wilberding / Ekaterina Burduli2-8
2025-06-07vs EW-PFC-WilberdingLost 12
W#1 DoublesCaisey Lee Emery / Trudie Puskedra vs Kristin Larson / Maggie Fiocchi8-0
L#1 SinglesSaryn Mooney vs Gracie Smyley1-8
L#2 DoublesAshley Spencer / Madalyn Williams vs Rachel Aldridge / Scout Mathews4-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PFC-Wilberding2275558
2S OR-ESTC-Williams2257763

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.70 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Caisey Lee Emery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Ashley Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.51
Madalyn Williams
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
Kimber Stovesand
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sarah Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Saryn Mooney
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sharon Bellusci
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Trudie Puskedra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Bellusci + Sarah Kelly3355% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Caisey Lee Emery
15W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.88
5
Ashley Spencer
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Madalyn Williams
46W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.51
Kimber Stovesand
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Kelly
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Saryn Mooney
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Bellusci
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trudie Puskedra
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.