Teams

Cheval Aces and Eights - N. Martinez

2023 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 and Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.92 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesMelany Jablonski / Felipe Martinez vs Beth Hart / Randolph Gibson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-05vs HCC - PoresuyoWon 10
W#1 DoublesCraig Arndt / Brenda Kunkel vs Tu Phan / Rebecca Evangelista7-6, 6-3
2023-02-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesKristin McCormick / Stephen McCormick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-20vs RiverHills - T. ManganelloLost 01
L#1 DoublesFelipe Martinez / Heidi Milan vs Teresa Manganello / Ignacio Molina1-6, 3-6
2023-02-05vs Lake Padgett - S. RoyLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeidi Milan / Peter Marsocci vs Beth Hart / Paul Zack6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephen McCormick / Kristin McCormick vs Sonia Patrick / James Schneider6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2023-01-22vs Florida/Helme/40&Over8.0XDLost 01
L#1 DoublesCraig Arndt / Kristin McCormick vs Mike Moenter / Julie Sakre6-7, 1-6
2023-01-08vs HCC - PoresuyoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCraig Arndt / Natalie Martinez vs Jonathan F Collazo / Emiliya Cogdill7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJason Crow / Melany Jablonski vs Manny Lopez / Alys Klouse6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Craig Arndt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Melany Jablonski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Felipe Martinez
published 4
3.75
Kornelia Kis
published
3.75
Peter Marsocci
published
3.68
Natalie Martinez
published
3.64
Todd Abrams
published
3.61
Karen Abrams
published
3.49
Casey Gates
published 4
3.48
Kristin McCormick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Heidi Milan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jason Crow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Martinez + Felipe Martinez224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Craig Arndt
65W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
4
Melany Jablonski
135W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Felipe Martinez
23W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.87
Kornelia Kis
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Peter Marsocci
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.75
Natalie Martinez
24W–23L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
Todd Abrams
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
Karen Abrams
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Casey Gates
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Kristin McCormick
105W–82L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Heidi Milan
82W–157L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Jason Crow
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.