Teams

Super Smash Rally

2025 B · CS Mixed 18 & Over League

5 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for CS Mixed 18 & Over League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Kristina Walters
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Marco Pereira
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Natalie Kidd
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Shay Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Sherry Bonds
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristina Walters + Marco Pereira0541% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristina Walters
7W–12L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marco Pereira
4W–6L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Kidd
7W–16L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shay Simpson
13W–11L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherry Bonds
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.