Teams

Creager 4.0 40+

2023 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Fall 2022- HSV · 4.0 WOMEN 40N1S3D

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN 40N1S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Christi Cappelletti
published 3.5
3.28
Elizabeth Kenney
published 3.5
Bridget Lovinger
published 3.5
3.22
Jennifer Crowe
published
3.20
Katherine Russell
published
3.19
Katy Ripley
published
3.16
Libby Neill
published
3.14
Elizabeth Sudderth
published 3.5
3.11
Tara Curry
published
3.10
Cindy Gattis
published 3.5
2.97
Susie Brock
published
2.80
Ann Creager
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Kenney + Elizabeth Sudderth6259% games+4.8% vs expected
Tara Curry + Susie Brock044 matchesnot enough data
Tara Curry + Cindy Gattis213 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Russell + Susie Brock213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christi Cappelletti
55W–59L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Elizabeth Kenney
60W–51L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Bridget Lovinger
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Crowe
26W–26L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Katherine Russell
76W–81L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Katy Ripley
20W–72L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Libby Neill
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Elizabeth Sudderth
24W–35L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
Tara Curry
15W–26L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Cindy Gattis
15W–30L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Susie Brock
32W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Ann Creager
26W–35L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.