Teams

SLlewellyn-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-24vs MHanauer-DURLost 01
L#1 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Daniel Martchek2-6, 0-6
2026-06-17vs JLundberg-DURWon 21
L#1 SinglesVisakan Jayakumar vs Zack Czajkowski3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Michael Weslander6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Al Pick6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-10vs JClough-DFCWon 21
L#1 SinglesTyler Carroll vs Eric Pollak7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Krishna Vallabhaneni6-1, 7-6
W#3 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Charles Wood6-1, 6-1
2026-06-03vs MHanauer-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesKelvin Menezes vs Raymond Xu1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Jackson Cabell6-2, 6-0
2026-05-27vs JLundberg-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesKelvin Menezes vs Zack Czajkowski7-5, 7-6
W#2 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Joshua Lundberg6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Michael Weslander6-2, 6-4
2026-05-20vs GDichter-CHTCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKelvin Menezes vs Reed Breneman6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesTyler Carroll vs Jackson Naftel4-6, 2-6
2026-05-13vs JByrd-NCCULost 12
L#1 SinglesTyler Carroll vs Herman Gudjonson0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesVisakan Jayakumar vs Chandler Nguyen2-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Brett Eckles6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-06vs JClough-DFCWon 30
W#1 SinglesKelvin Menezes vs Todd Resly6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Krishna Vallabhaneni6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Rod Snyder6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Tyler Carroll
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.27
Spencer Llewellyn
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.24
Kelvin Menezes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.23
Visakan Jayakumar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.14
Ryan Sayko
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Spencer Llewellyn + Visakan Jayakumar4155% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Sayko + Spencer Llewellyn224 matchesnot enough data
Tyler Carroll + Visakan Jayakumar314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Carroll
22W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Spencer Llewellyn
230W–157L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Kelvin Menezes
13W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
4.24
Visakan Jayakumar
24W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Ryan Sayko
78W–106L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
4.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.